refer to a series of psychological studies aimed at understanding how small groups or minorities can influence the opinions and behavior of the majority, even if they hold the opposite point of view. The aim of these experiments was to examine the group dynamics that allow minorities to change group attitudes or influence prevailing tendencies in the long run, as opposed to the influence of the majority, which often leads to immediate submission to group norms. From a psychological point of view, Moscovici’s experiments demonstrated that minorities who hold stable and consistent views tend to attract attention and provoke a reassessment of their views by the majority. Minority influence is most pronounced when the group demonstrates clarity, consistency, and logical force in its arguments, as well as a distinctive style that makes opposing views appear rational and balanced. This type of influence demonstrates that social change can be initiated by a small but determined and cohesive group, and that people tend to revise their views even if they do not initially publicly identify with a minority. From a social perspective, Moscovici’s experiments demonstrate that active minorities play an important role in the development of social norms and cultural values, as well as in moving societies towards innovation and change. They promote intellectual flexibility, stimulate discussion, and reduce intellectual rigidity within the group. The results also indicate that minorities can indirectly influence the majority by stimulating critical thinking, reflection and re-evaluation of information, which in the long term leads to the adoption of some of their views or a change in group attitudes.